Vice-Speaker of Parliament, a member of the ruling Republican Party of Armenia (RPA), Samvel Nikoyan December 17 stated that the law was enacted to legal justification for further possible action to protect Russian citizens in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, saying that it was done after the fact. Nevertheless, he acknowledged that there is a certain logic. As for the military Russia's involvement in other conflicts, in particular, to protect its citizens in the territory of Armenia, according to S. Nikoyan, relations between Armenia and Russia in the military sphere are governed by agreements under the CSTO. (We can correct the vice-speaker – and even terms and conditions of the "Big Treaty" between Russia and Armenia.) This agreement involves the provision of military assistance to the CSTO member states in case of a threat to their sovereignty – in the form of aggression or threat of such. "So that the law can not apply to Armenia", – he said. The opinion of the opposition forces a far cry from the standpoint of the ruling Republican Party. We have decided to allocate statement one of the parliamentary opposition parties – the "Heritage" ("Heritage"). As the head of its faction, a member of the Association of Political Scientists of Armenia Stepan Safarian, the reasons for the adoption of this law lie in the hostilities in South Ossetia in 2008 and, in effect, Russia wants a quick and timely intervene in the situation in the event of an attack on its military forces. He noted that these laws apply to all those areas where there are Russian military bases or troops of the Russian military.
Moreover, given the contemporary realist thinking masses, one of their number does not hope and do not believe that then, in "Kingdom of Heaven" to them for their backbreaking labor and clearly undeserved humiliation and trampling on the ground, will be rewarded in full, and the "new Russian" and their modern receivers' confidant of debauchery ", they have lost everything and forever will be punished by "God's court." The current "imposed" government psevdodiskussiya only confirms the above. "Removal of the body" will be only in order to completely "besotted" people "forgot" about Lenin, who, by their entities and policies, was far more "Christian" than modern, "illiterate" in this sense, the rulers, which alone can that "recreate" the stolen money for the people's Christ the Savior, but with thick candle and nothing expresses the person issuing them a clear lack of understanding of its place here, to stand in church on Easter. A immoderate detailing the facts and details in some of the comments only "leads" reasonable person of the true foundations of the processes. So ladies and gentlemen of the United Russia and especially catapulted this idea in order to completely normal people, not discussing the urgent at the present stage Russia's development challenge, fascinated by the controversy, "gnawed" among themselves. Let the "tear the throat" with each other over the long-dead, fewer will think about the present. The question of the removal of Lenin's body is a purely political action distracting people from the problems of modernity against the background of today's personal dislike of politicians to the deceased.