The order of accumulation of processes, can be done before any of the judges, which dealt with the processes. It must be appended to the letter asking the accumulation of processes, backup demand certified for your reply, if any. The order of accumulation is coming, even before issued judgement in processes to accumulate. The order of accumulation of processes, prevents the expedition of judgment, while not be resolved definitively such cumulation. The order of accumulation of processes, the judge runs transfer to the other party by within three days. With the reply or expired, the judge, issued resolution declaring founded or unfounded request, based on the accompanied by proof.
The resolution pronounced the judge in build-up processes orders, is appealable without suspensive effect (Art. 90 C.P.A.). If it is declared founded, the successive accumulation of processes, is processed the cause or processes accumulated before the judge, who made the first location. The accumulation of processes, ordered ex officio by the judge, when processes are dealt with in the same Court (Art. 90 C.P.A.). This kind of accumulation of processes this based on the principle of procedural economy and to avoid contradictory judgments. 1.3 DECUMULATION procedural figure of the decumulation of processes is regulated by the code of Civil procedure. That order on the one hand, points out that when have accumulated in a single process two or more autonomous processes, attending the connectedness and eventual difference in cumulative processes pending, the judge can have its decumulation pending, which means that it is not an absolute decumulation, reserving the right of issuing a single sentence (Art.
89, last paragraph, C.P.A.). In another numeral Code establishes that where the judge considers that the accumulation affects the principle of procedural economy, by reason of time, expense, or human effort, can separate processes, which should be followed regardless before its original judges (Art. 91 C.P.A.), understanding, by its text, in the latter case the decumulation is absolute, as the judge of the accumulation not reserves the right of sentencing the cumulative causes, as in previous case. Original author and source of the article