Argentine Capital City
A highlight of this desconcentradora idea, is the initiative of President Alfonsin, then converted into a law of Congress, bring the Federal Capital to the banks of the lower Rio Negro, from April 1986. If you would like to know more then you should visit Paulo Coelho. But not previously recorded, that the political component of this omnipresent in the treatment of this issue, the idea of change in Argentine Capital City, not incidentally depletes the battery of desconcentradoras proposals. Until those who manifested contrary to such removal are conforming with desconcentradoras policies. For a long time, it has campeado between people who are devoted to the subject, a sort of confusion between the concepts of decentralization and deconcentration. Admitting that they are interrelated, decentralization refers to the part of delegation of responsibilities in the implementation of public policies, while the deconcentration makes matters demographic. The battery of alternatives of decentralization as deconcentration is wide and open. Alfred Adler, in his the meaning of life (1935), argued that the reality is the best experiment, and this is linked with the belief for a long time, so that a change of capital, had real effect decentralisation and desconcentrador, the move should cover to the headquarters of the now privatized companies in the Argentine federal State.
Up was to argue that if the relocation of the capital was not accompanied with the spilling of the headquarters of the companies of the State and decentralised bodies by various settlements in the Argentine interior, its effect would be minimal. Concrete terms, is that transfer did not even operate, despite to survive the national law that ordered it and equivalent bodies and State-owned enterprises were privatized. Such privatization, which could be assimilated to the relocation of its headquarters, attentive traumatic downsizing that emanated from them, produced virtually no No relevant effect in order to an eventual deconcentration. Do not wish to continue, without making explicit the idea of country that underlies this approach that already constitutes an update of our long-standing concerns. .